Publication Title
George Washington Law Review
Volume
76
Page
1153
Year
2008
Abstract
In earlier work, I found that more than 40% of Treasury regulations studied are susceptible to legal challenge for their failure to satisfy Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements. Given this finding, why is it that taxpayers rarely raise such claims? The article explores this question and focuses particularly on statutory and doctrinal limitations on pre-enforcement judicial review in the tax context and their role in further limiting post-enforcement challenges. Although the article proposes ways in which the courts could relax the limitations on pre-enforcement judicial review in tax cases, the article also acknowledges that the courts are unlikely to change course and that congressional action may be necessary.
Recommended Citation
Kristin Hickman, A Problem of Remedy: Responding to Treasury's (Lack of) Compliance with Administrative Procedure Act Rulemaking Requirements, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1153 (2008), available at https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/74.
Archival Statement
Note: The documents on this page were created before current policy requirements took effect, and therefore may not be accessible. Request this content in an accessible format.
