Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism
Abstract
Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism: a review essay of: Beyond all reason: the radical assault on truth in American law. By Daniel Farber & Suzanna Sherry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1997. Pp. 208.
Volume
15
Issue
1
Page
185
Year
1998
Recommended Citation
Roderick M. Hills Jr.,
Truth or Consequences? The Inadequacy of Consequentialist Arguments Against Multicultural Relativism,
15
Const. Comment.
185
(1998).
Available at:
https://doi.org/10.24926/26390742.2141
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.24926/26390742.2141
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Publication Abbreviation
Const. Comment.
Included in
Archival Statement
Note: The documents on this page were created before current policy requirements took effect, and therefore may not be accessible. Request this content in an accessible format.
