•  
  •  
 

Minnesota Journal of International Law (vol. 28:2 to present)

Abstract

This Article examines the competitive dynamics in the global law market through the lens of the statutory evolution of the Rule in Hastings-Bass across various International Financial Centers (IFCs). Following the UK Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter, which significantly restricted the judiciary’s ability to void trustee decisions under the Rule, seven IFCs (Jersey, Bermuda, The Bahamas, the Dubai International Financial Center, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands) enacted statutes to preserve and clarify the Rule within their jurisdictions. These legislative actions highlight the strategic adaptations by IFCs to enhance their legal frameworks and maintain a competitive edge in providing sophisticated trust services. By codifying the Rule, these jurisdictions have addressed key criticisms of the common law version, ensuring greater certainty, flexibility, and protection for trust beneficiaries. The Article argues that this evolution exemplifies the positive role of jurisdictional competition in improving legal services and facilitating international financial transactions, thereby contributing to the global economy.

Volume

34

Issue

2

Page Number

121

Download

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS