Publication
Valparaiso University Law Review
Volume
46
Page
447
Year
2012
Abstract
This symposium analyzes the role of litigation in climate change regulation, with a particular focus on the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2011 decision in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut ("AEP"). 1 This Essay adds to that conversation by exploring the significance of AEP for U.S. federal legal approaches to regulating climate change.
Recommended Citation
Hari M. Osofsky, Litigation's Role in the Path of U.S. Federal Climate Change Regulation: Implications of AEP v. Connecticut, 46 Val. U. L. Rev. 447 (2012), available at https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/187.
