Submissions from 2020
Lawyers and Historians Argue about the Constitution, Jack M. Balkin
The Cradle of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, John W. Compton
What We Did Not Know About Judicial Review: On Keith Whittington’s Repugnant Laws, Leslie F. Goldstein
Ship-Money: The Case that Time and Whittington Forgot, Mark A. Graber
Mastering the Cases and Delineating the Role of the Supreme Court, Sanford Levinson
Litigating Imperfect Solutions: State Constitutional Claims in Federal Court, Michael T. Morley
How the Umpires Remake the Game, Julie Novkov
Herein of "Herein Granted": Why Article I's Vesting Clause Does Not Support the Doctrine of Enumerated Powers, Richard Primus
Constituting a People: The Challenge of the Indian Founding, Cheryl Saunders
Sadomasochistic Judging, David Schraub
Reconsidering the History of Judicial Review, Keith E. Whittington
Submissions from 2019
In Honor of a Simple-Minded Originalist, James Allan
The Genetic Fallacy and a Living Constitution, Charles L. Barzun
The Parts We Skip: A Taxonomy of Constitutional Irrelevancy, Peter Beck
States of Continuity Or State of Exception: Race, Law and Politics in the Age of Trump Symposium: Constitutional Law in the Trump Era, Devon W. Carbado
Constitutional Maturity, Or Reading Weber in the Age of Trump Symposium: Constitutional Law in the Trump Era, Josh Chafetz
Sex, Trump, and Constitutional Change Symposium: Constitutional Law in the Trump Era, Helen Hershkoff and Elizabeth M. Schneider
Madison's Denials Book Review, Calvin H. Johnson
Fixing Implied Constitutional Powers in the Founding Era, John Mikhail
Justice Holmes’ Logic of Force, Benjamin Patrick Newton
McCulloch V. Marbury, Kermit Roosevelt III and Heath Khan
The Reality Principle, Lawrence G. Sager and Nelson Tebbe
Originalism Off the Ground: A Response to Professors Baude and Sachs, Eric J. Segall
Should the Left Dissent?, Nelson Tebbe
Practical Equality and the Limits of Second Best Strategies for Justice, Franita Tolson
The Hidden Costs of Dissent, Robert L. Tsai
How “Commerce Among the Several States” Became “Interstate Commerce,” and Why It Matters, Conrad J. Weiler Jr.
From Appendix to Heart: Tracing the History of the Bill of Rights, Lael Weinberger
Submissions from 2018
The Freedom of Non-Speech Book Reviews, Enrique Armijo
Arguing about the Constitution: The Topics in Constitutional Interpretation, Jack M. Balkin
Enforcing the Decisions of the People Book Reviews, Joel I. Colon-Rios
But Maybe Everything That Dies Someday Comes Back Book Reviews, Martin S. Flaherty
Reasoning through Clashes between Religion and Equality: Case Law, Skeptics, and Social Coherence Book Reviews, Michael A. Helfand
Special Justifications Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Randy J. Kozel
Mostly Settled, but Right for Now Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Corinna Barrett Lain
Supreme Court Norms of Impersonality Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Allison Orr Larsen
Judicial Supremacy: Palladium of Liberty or Academic Paradox Book Reviews, Nelson Lund
Subprecedents Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Jason Mazzone
Stephen Presser's Love Letter to the Law, in Five Parts Book Reviews, Jesse Merriam
Michael Klarman's Framers' Coup (and the News from Antifidelity) Book Reviews, Frank I. Michelman
Ulysses S. Grant and the Lost Opportunity for Racial Justice Book Reviews, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Making Sense of Equality Book Review Symposium: One Another's Equals: The Basis of Human Equality, Mark D. Rosen
Single-Member Districts Are Not Constitutionally Required, Robert E. Ross and Barrett Anderson
Precedent and the Semblance of Law Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Stephen E. Sachs
On Treating Unlike Cases Alike Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Frederick Schauer
Originalist Theory and Precedent: A Public Meaning Approach Book Review Symposium: Settled versus Right: A Theory of Precedent, Lawrence B. Solum
The Rule of Law Sold Short Book Reviews, Richard Stacey
Submissions from 2017
Family Reunification and the Security State, Kerry Abrams
Do Judges Know Best?, James Allan
Which Republican Constitution?, Jack M. Balkin
In Defense of Constitutional Republicanism: A Reply to Criticisms of Our Republican Constitution, Randy E. Barnett
Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty, Amy Coney Barrett
Hate Speech, Public Assurance, and the Civic Standing of Speakers and Victims, Vincent Blasi
Hate Speech Laws, Legitimacy, and Precaution: A Reply to James Weinstein, Alexander Brown
Republicanism and Natural Rights at the Founding, Jud Campbell
Objects of Interpretation, Richard Ekins
Political Political Theory Theory, Jeremy D. Farris and William A. Edmundson
Hate Speech--Definitions & Empirical Evidence, Katharine Gelber
Redefining Parental Rights: The Case of Corporal Punishment, Cynthia Godsoe
Constitutional Parentage, Joanna L. Grossman
Taking Legitimacy Seriously: A Return to Deontology, Eric Heinze
Creating Precedents Through Words and Deeds, Harold J. Krent
Randy Barnett’s Critique of Democracy (And John Marshall?), Sanford Levinson
The Doctor Requirement: Griswold, Privacy, and At-Home Reproductive Care, Yvonne Lindgren
Intersectionality and the Constitution of Family Status, Serena Mayeri
Me the People, Jason Mazzone
Rational Basis "Plus", Thomas B. Nachbar
The Family's Constitution, Douglas NeJaime
Legitimacy and Hate Speech, Robert C. Post
Free Speech and Obedience to Law, Frederick Schauer
Hate Speech, Legitimacy, and the Foundational Principles of Government, Steven H. Shiffrin
Republican Constitutionalism, Lawrence B. Solum
Viewpoint Discrimination, Hate Speech Laws, and the Double-Sided Nature of Freedom of Speech, Adrienne Stone
Formalism in Constitutional Theory, Cass R. Sunstein
The Conditions of Legitimacy: A Response to James Weinstein, Jeremy Waldron
Hate Speech Bans, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy, James Weinstein
Viewpoint Discrimination, Hate Speech, and Political Legitimacy: A Reply, James Weinstein
Submissions from 2016
The Construction of Original Public Meaning, Jack M. Balkin
On Jim Fleming’s Anti-Originalism, Sotirios A. Barber
The Document and the Drama, William Bennett
The Staying Power of Erroneous Dicta: from Curtiss-Wright to Zivotofsky, Louis Fisher
Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: A Response to Six Views, James E. Fleming
Intelligent or Unintelligent Fidelity?, Imer B. Flores
Silent Concurrences, Greg Goelzhauser
Rethinking Judicial Supremacy, Lino A. Graglia
The Meming of Substantive Due Process, Jamal Greene
Legislative Power and Judicial Power, John Harrison
Originalism’s Curiously Triumphant Death: The Interpenetration of Aspirationalism and Historicism in U.S. Constitutional Development, Ken I. Kersch
Discretionary Dockets, Randy J. Kozel and Jeffrey A. Pojanowski
What One Can Learn from Foreign-Language Translations of the U.S. Constitution, Sanford Levinson
Reading DeBoer and Obergefell Through the “Moral Readings Versus Originalisms” Debate: from Constitutional “Empty Cupboards” to Evolving Understandings, Linda C. McClain
Dutch and German Founding-Era Translations of the U.S. Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn
Founding-Era Translations of the U.S. Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn
Founding-Era Translations of the U.S. Constitution. Appendix, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn
A Biography of Madison’s Notes of Debates, Jack Rakove
Fidelity to the Best Version of Ourselves, Lawrence Sager
Submissions from 2015
The Glorious Revolution and the Rule of Recognition, James Allan
South African Constitutional Doctors with Low Public Support, Or Bassok
